In our fundamental need to feel connected, identify ourselves and surroundings, attribute meaning to increasingly chaotic circumstances, relational and systemic disintegration triggering our emotions and prior induced traumas, the carefully designed daily headlines and supportive imagery offer an alluring mental and emotional context wherein we can seemingly feel safe in numbers, psychologically soothed, morally back patted and collectively united toward a predetermined and hopefully worded political outcome.
However, without critical thinking and spiritual discernment we are unknowingly lead to the proverbial slaughter. Lured and drawn in by ego-attractive propositions such as moral superiority, political enlightenment, humanistic hope, change and eco-consciousness, our actual sin ridden world is rapidly closing in on us until we are forced to become responsive to its factual consequences and seek real and hopefully Godly guidance, relief and ultimately salvation.
Dare and care to look behind the scenes
What happens if we care and dare to look behind the branded elite efforts, their cynically staged photo-ops, designed to look as if ‘our brave leaders’ have universal truth, righteousness and millions behind them and are on the front lines uniting the world to overcome the ‘de facto’ self-induced systemic crisis under the guise of worldwide terrorism, climate change and other fabricated enemies?
This top down perspective sheds some light on such elite staged (in this case the post Charlie Hebdo demonstration) events, designed to capture our hearts, minds and emotions and steer us in a predetermined political direction, herding us into a false, world encompassing unity and control structure.
A sharp contrast with the official press released images where elite headed mass civilian marching was suggested while most elite participants diligently buried blatant anti-free press skeletons in an attempt to seize the public movement for self serving political and PR purposes.
Unless discerned and counteracted we passively allow ourselves to be mentally and emotionally hooked in and subsequently activated under unlawful guidance. Step by step, slogan by slogan, image by image, crisis event by crisis event, policy reform by policy reform, accompanied by branding and rebranding efforts toward self induced political weakening an increasingly tightened control grid and sovereignty undermining measures which ultimately lead toward imprisonment and (self-) destruction.
In that light we discern the following pre and post Paris attacks branding strategy, a multistep effort we are called to identify with, submit to and participate in.
‘Je suis Charlie’ | turned ‘Je suis Paris’ | turned ‘Je suis vert’
Thus, after the Charlie Hebdo induced free speech, expression and media movement was bound to the post Paris attacks anti-terrorism agenda, those who haven’t already, are currently solicited to connect with the worldwide anti-climate change agenda, center stage this week at the Paris Climate Conference (UN COP 21).
All the while the Paris venue is still under extended martial law and worldwide media, academic researchers and political dissidents are increasingly hindered and even silenced in order for the elite’s fear induced eco-totalitarianism to gain ground unhindered and unopposed.
Standing on an artificial grass foundation (typical) and under the Eiffel Tower emitted green enlightenment, French president Hollande just welcomed Obama and 150 other world leaders amid unprecedented security operation to thrash a new climate change deal.
According to Hollande ‘The hope of all humanity rests on these leaders’ shoulders’ – embedded a dire sounding warning – while behind the scenes the threat of WWIII is clouding over the conference, manifesting at the event as President Putin alleged refusal to meet the Turkish president Erdogan due to anger over the jet downing.
In addition to worldwide political support for this proposed climate agenda, the event’s weight is increased by both papal endorsement, worldwide religious institutions’ support as well as royal presence and admonitions.
A today’s headline on royal support, this time for the Monaco World Climate March, another carefully co-branded street parade with orchestrated photo-ops.
Thus, looking center stage as well as behind the scenes, a massive multilevel branding effort designed to brand, connect and lead us, like cattle or herded sheep, towards severe near future consequences of self induced economic and political restraints is well under way.
The united world elite is inviting us to go green while shrouded in self centered political interest and falsehoods. Will you?
Joshua 24:14-15 King James Version (KJV)
14 Now therefore fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the Lord.
15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
Branding – Etymology online
maverick (n.) 1867, “calf or yearling found without an owner’s brand,” so called for Samuel A. Maverick (1803-1870), Texas cattle owner who was negligent in branding his calves. Sense of “individualist, unconventional person” is first recorded 1886, via notion of “masterless.”
brand (v.) c. 1400, “to brand, cauterize; stigmatize,” originally of criminal marks or cauterized wounds, from brand (n.). As a means of marking property, 1580s; figuratively from c. 1600, often in a bad sense, with the criminal marking in mind. Related: Branded;branding.
brindled (adj.) “marked with streaks, streaked with a dark color,” 1670s, from Middle English brended (early 15c.), from bren “brown color” (13c.), noun made from past participle of brennen “burn” (see burn (v.)); the derived adjective perhaps means “marked as though by branding or burning.” Form altered perhaps by influence of kindled.
cauterize (v.) c. 1400, from Old French cauterisier, from Late Latin cauterizare “to burn or brand with a hot iron,” from Greek kauteriazein, from kauter “burning or branding iron,” from kaiein “to burn” (see caustic). Related: Cauterized; cauterizing.
Brand – Wikipedia
A brand (or marque for car model) is a name, term, design, symbol or other feature that distinguishes one seller’s product from those of others. Brands are used in business, marketing, and advertising. Initially, livestock branding was adopted to differentiate one person’s cattle from another’s by means of a distinctive symbol burned into the animal’s skin with a hot branding iron.
In accounting, a brand defined as an intangible asset is often the most valuable asset on a corporation’s balance sheet. Brand owners manage their brands carefully to create shareholder value, and brand valuation is an important management technique that ascribes a money value to a brand, and allows marketing investment to be managed (e.g.: prioritized across a portfolio of brands) to maximize shareholder value. Although only acquired brands appear on a company’s balance sheet, the notion of putting a value on a brand forces marketing leaders to be focused on long term stewardship of the brand and managing for value.
The word “brand” is often used as a metonym referring to the company that is strongly identified with a brand.
Marque or make are often used to denote a brand of motor vehicle, which may be distinguished from a car model. A concept brand is a brand that is associated with an abstract concept, like breast cancer awareness orenvironmentalism, rather than a specific product, service, or business. A commodity brand is a brand associated with a commodity.
Updated and developed. H/T Steve Quayle